Archives

01 Aug - 31 Aug 2006
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2006
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2006
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2006
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2006
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2007
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2007
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2007
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2007
01 May - 31 May 2007
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2007
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2007
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2007
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2007
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2008
01 Feb - 29 Feb 2008
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2008
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2008
01 May - 31 May 2008
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2008
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2008
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2008
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2008
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2008
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2009
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2009
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2009
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2009
01 May - 31 May 2009
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2009
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2009
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2009
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2009
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2009
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2009
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2009
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2010
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2010
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2010

Less Wrong
Overcoming Bias
Slashdot
Industrial Music forum
This Modern World
last.fm profile
Opir music project
-
EFF
ACLU
Counterpunch
Huffington Post
Creative Commons
Shays' Agreement: religious takeover of the Republican party
Alternet
Dissident Voice
Daily Kos
Freethought and Rationalism
Scientific American
Science Daily
PhysOrg
O'reilly Tech News
Sysadmin
ACM
The Register
IEEE Spectrum
TechCrunch
Silicon Alley Insider
Naked Capitalism
Gizmodo
Gothamist: New York City News
Programming Reddit
The Brights: Naturalistic thinking
Secular Coalation for America
Childfree News
The Pragmatic Programmer

Miscellany

Powered by Pivot - 1.40.6: 'Dreadwind'

« Repo | Home | Raver wear going main… »

The beginning of the end of Market Fundamentalism

Greenspan admits mistakes in his ideology.

How many of us have been saying this stuff, and for how long? The idea that "self-interested" institutions and individuals will always make collectively optimal, or even rational choices is absurd and has been disproved over and over again. Now, Greenspan, the self-titled Libertarian, who worshiped an Objectivist, and governed his central bank like a Neoliberal finally sees the dangers of no market oversight or regulation. That's right, it does not work. It's all about finding the right mix of rules and regulations, private and public, shared risk and individual risk - not just saying "all X is bad" or "all X is good". It has to be an ongoing, constantly renegotiated process and balance. This is one of the tenets of heterodox economics - using empirical methods to find out what works - not just deciding the process and saying that whatever will be, will be. That's called "process legitimizes outcome", and is complete and utter trash.

My, how the mighty have fallen.

No trackbacks:

Trackback link:

Please enable javascript to generate a trackback url